21 Comments

One small step for Tucker, one giant leap for Russia in its efforts to counter the MSM narrative.

Kudos to Tucker Carlson

Expand full comment
Feb 9·edited Feb 9Liked by Mike Hampton

Thanks, Mike. While I have my doubts about Tucker's motivation. Your footnotes helped me skip the boring parts. The fact that we seem to need to take down Russia has many vile roots. The many things WEF and modern thought wants , Russia is against.

Thus if you're in favor of Transgender Officers,self hate,and eating bugs,go with the west. If these things appall you and you don't want to eat bugs,you're a Russian sympathizer

Have a nice evening 😊

Expand full comment
author

Tucker: "Who blew up Nord Stream?"

Putin: "You for sure."

Tucker: "I was busy that day. I did not blow up Nord Stream."

Putin: "You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi."

Expand full comment
author

Tucker: I just gotta ask you one last question. And that's about someone who is very famous in the United States. Probably not here. Evan Gershkovich who's the Wall Street Journal reporter. He's 32. And he's been in prison for almost a year. This is a huge story in the United States. And I just want to ask you directly, without getting into the details of it or your version of what happened, if, as a sign of your decency, you would be willing to release him to us and we'll bring him back to the United States.

Putin: We have done so many gestures of goodwill out of decency that I think we have run out of them. We have never seen anyone reciprocate to us in a similar manner. However, in theory, we can say that we do not rule out that we can do that if our partners take reciprocal steps. When I talk about the partners, I first of all refer to special services. Special services are in contact with one another. They are talking about the matter in question. There is no taboo to settle this issue. We are willing to solve it but there are certain terms being discussed via special services channels. I believe an agreement can be reached.

Expand full comment

Anyone who did the research over time and when this war began knew that the provocations had come from the US/Nato using Ukraine and that it was always a proxy war waged by the US, using its lackey Nato, and its fools in Ukraine, in a bid to weaken Russia and break it apart. All of this had been stated by Americans more than once. And since their actions supported such words, why would the Russians not see them as the threat they were, are and intended to be.

Expand full comment
author

NPR is an example of the crazy headlines: 'Tucker Carlson, the fired Fox News star, makes bid for relevance with Putin interview'. That conveniently skips all the other interviews seen by millions.

Expand full comment
Feb 9Liked by Mike Hampton

I thought it was an interesting interview, not only for its content, but as an important placement for where we are. The list of western leaders who could pull off a two hour stint like this is very short and certainly wouldn’t include tweedledum and tweedledee who are currently our prospective nominees in the US. I enjoyed Putin’s historical musings at the start. I was wondering if Tucker would get to the journalist as most of his jealous peers were saying he wouldn’t. Tucker did make a couple asinine statements but overall the tone was good. Putin didn’t give me much new info outside the historical stuff but as you have said before Mike, we both follow ‘stacks’ where Putin is considered somewhat of a deity.

Expand full comment

Anyone who knew the history could work that out but clearly either those in the US Government, military, CIA etc., either do not know the history or cannot work out anything.

Expand full comment