Israel must co-operate with the United Nations to ensure food, water, electricity, fuel, shelter, clothing, hygiene, sanitation, and medical requirements.
If all that was in response to "far right", yes "far right" is often a deliberately misused term in America and European politics, but it's justified for these extremists blocking humanitarian aid. Are you standing up for them? And why would crimes of history nullify crimes of the present. Netanhayu exists without Winnie Mandela.
First things first, 'cause pointing fingers in many directions dilutes the topic, especially when one doesn't know where its coming from.
1. Argument is given credibility by the debaters using their real names. Anonymity questions purpose.
2. By your argument that Palestinians must starve for supporting Hamas, then every non-black South African should have been starved for Apartheid. And every black that voted for the corruption of the ANC should be starved too. Everyone dead, no South Africa, problem sorted?
3. No matter the evil that YouTube sometime is, you can't dismiss a video as false just because its there. There's overwhelming supporting evidence for Israel blocking humanitarian supplies, and event he biased ICJ acknowledges that. You avoided the content, and that's likely also why you sought to deride Blumenthal.
4. There are too many people funded for Soros for me to believe they are all deliberately part of a conspiracy. And I cannot hold it against someone if, early in their career they worked for a publication associated with Soros, and now tread an independent path. I don't claim to know Blumenthal intimately, but, for now, his bravery outweighs criticism.
5. When a Soros publication exposes corruption in the ANC, it has value. My problem is that when it only shoots in one direction, the political motive becomes a bigger concern than the morality of revealing crime.
You're here to defend Israel, and use Soros as an angle because Zionists hate him.
I'm happy to give my time to debate but needed to know you're not a troll, since this is a an era of trolling. So, #1, you refuse to stand your argument on your true identity. #2 I've never been part of DA or any party, and I'm not pro any party. #3. Palestinians are imprisoned i.e. they were not attacked first. #4 is the reason why I'm banning you. "I detest Hamas because they are vile sexually depraved Rapists, murderers and Necrophiliacs." But Israel can rape and kill on a bigger scale, but that's ok by you because they're not Muslims. I'm interested in argument, not racism.
Again,the thought of pruning the genome tree of mankind come to my mind. Soon this will come back to the US in many ways. Feeding the people you wish to eliminate only prolongs their misery.
It does come across better in the press.
Sadly the acts af man will end ,most likely like this : a futile drama of no particular importance. Insignificant ,and un missed by the universe.
Perhaps we will find that a Mad Max evriomemt is where we will regain our root and those surviving will find a natural path.
Or maybe the Israelis will learn from the Union Army, and start giving out horse blankets loaded with Small Pox.
I'm firmly of the belief that Humankind is inherently evil, and that's paradoxically the reason for our success. Willpower is modern morality, a force strong enough to help us evolve.
That's true, Mike. We created evil gods to live under. It is far easier to steel food than to buy it. Can we look down on baboons when we are so close to them.
As a buzzard has a useful purpose in the food chain, can humans be any more than cannon fodder?
As a somewhat kind old cowboy and Army guy I've no no need to fight except for self protection. And no need to take game if the grocery stores are open.
When this land is taken back by Mexico, that may change.
If all that was in response to "far right", yes "far right" is often a deliberately misused term in America and European politics, but it's justified for these extremists blocking humanitarian aid. Are you standing up for them? And why would crimes of history nullify crimes of the present. Netanhayu exists without Winnie Mandela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqRzfb2oMaM
First things first, 'cause pointing fingers in many directions dilutes the topic, especially when one doesn't know where its coming from.
1. Argument is given credibility by the debaters using their real names. Anonymity questions purpose.
2. By your argument that Palestinians must starve for supporting Hamas, then every non-black South African should have been starved for Apartheid. And every black that voted for the corruption of the ANC should be starved too. Everyone dead, no South Africa, problem sorted?
3. No matter the evil that YouTube sometime is, you can't dismiss a video as false just because its there. There's overwhelming supporting evidence for Israel blocking humanitarian supplies, and event he biased ICJ acknowledges that. You avoided the content, and that's likely also why you sought to deride Blumenthal.
4. There are too many people funded for Soros for me to believe they are all deliberately part of a conspiracy. And I cannot hold it against someone if, early in their career they worked for a publication associated with Soros, and now tread an independent path. I don't claim to know Blumenthal intimately, but, for now, his bravery outweighs criticism.
5. When a Soros publication exposes corruption in the ANC, it has value. My problem is that when it only shoots in one direction, the political motive becomes a bigger concern than the morality of revealing crime.
You're here to defend Israel, and use Soros as an angle because Zionists hate him.
Grayzone doesn't seem to be in cahoots - https://thegrayzone.com/2021/10/27/billionaire-political-meddlers-disinformation-agents-launch-good-information-inc-to-fight-disinformation/
The link you provided to discredit Blumenthal is by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a Zionist organisation with terrible tactics.
I'm happy to give my time to debate but needed to know you're not a troll, since this is a an era of trolling. So, #1, you refuse to stand your argument on your true identity. #2 I've never been part of DA or any party, and I'm not pro any party. #3. Palestinians are imprisoned i.e. they were not attacked first. #4 is the reason why I'm banning you. "I detest Hamas because they are vile sexually depraved Rapists, murderers and Necrophiliacs." But Israel can rape and kill on a bigger scale, but that's ok by you because they're not Muslims. I'm interested in argument, not racism.
Again,the thought of pruning the genome tree of mankind come to my mind. Soon this will come back to the US in many ways. Feeding the people you wish to eliminate only prolongs their misery.
It does come across better in the press.
Sadly the acts af man will end ,most likely like this : a futile drama of no particular importance. Insignificant ,and un missed by the universe.
Perhaps we will find that a Mad Max evriomemt is where we will regain our root and those surviving will find a natural path.
Or maybe the Israelis will learn from the Union Army, and start giving out horse blankets loaded with Small Pox.
I'm firmly of the belief that Humankind is inherently evil, and that's paradoxically the reason for our success. Willpower is modern morality, a force strong enough to help us evolve.
That's true, Mike. We created evil gods to live under. It is far easier to steel food than to buy it. Can we look down on baboons when we are so close to them.
As a buzzard has a useful purpose in the food chain, can humans be any more than cannon fodder?
As a somewhat kind old cowboy and Army guy I've no no need to fight except for self protection. And no need to take game if the grocery stores are open.
When this land is taken back by Mexico, that may change.
It will be a good week for buzzards all the same
In our defence, we created rock 'n roll. And if we teach buzzards to headbang...
👍
"Land crossing", not airdrops and the sea port gimmick.
Action, not politics.